Starting January 22, 2024, all federal corporations created under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) are required to file information regarding individuals with significant control (ISCs) with Corporations Canada.

1.  Who is an ISC?

According to the CBCA, an ISC is an individual (see: human person) that:

• owns, controls or directs 25% or more of the shares of a corporation individually, jointly or in convert with one or more individuals;
• has control over the corporation without owning any shares; or
• meets a combination of any of the above two factors.

If a corporation’s shareholder is an entity (for example, a corporation, partnership, or trust), the individual(s) in control of such entity must be identified as ISCs.

Additionally, if multiple family members jointly own more than 25% of the shares of a corporation and one family member has sufficient influence over the other family members, such influential individual may be considered an ISC.

2.  What information will be filed?

The following information regarding ISCs must be filed with Corporations Canada:

Information that will be made public:

• full legal name;
• date on which the individual became an ISC;
• description of the ISC’s significant control; and
• mailing address.

Information that will not be made public:

• date of birth;
• country of citizenship;
• country of tax residency; and
• residential address.

If an ISC is less than 18 years of age, information will not be made publicly available until such individual turns 18 years old.

You may file an application to not make the information about an ISC public if:

• making the information publicly available presents or would present a serious threat to the safety of the individual;
• the ISC is declared incapable either by court or under provincial or territorial laws; or
• making the information publicly available would go against the Conflict of Interest Act or a similar legislation of a province or territory.

3.  Who is excluded from the ISC filing requirements?

Most federal corporations are required to comply with the new filing requirements, however, the following corporations are excluded:

• non-federal corporations (for example, a corporation incorporated under a province’s corporations act);
• a reporting issuer under provincial securities legislation or a wholly-owned subsidiary of a reporting issuer;
• a public corporation that trades its securities on a stock exchange designated by the Income Tax Act or a wholly-owned subsidiary of such a corporation; or
• a crown corporation or a wholly-owned subsidiary of a crown corporation.

4.  What does this mean for you?

If your corporation is federally incorporated and not exempt from the filing requirements, failure to maintain and file the ISC information may result in directors or officers facing penalties up to $1,000,000 or possible imprisonment, as well as potential fines to the corporation of up to $1,000,000 and involuntary dissolution.

Please reach out to the Voyer Law team to discuss your annual filing requirements and to maintain your corporation in good standing.

Weekly, we receive phone calls from prospective clients inquiring about provisional patent applications. While provisional patent applications have a number of benefits, especially for cost-conscious startups and entrepreneurs, we too often encounter misconceptions concerning the protections that a provisional patent application provides. In this blog post we will cover what a provision patent application is, its positives and negatives.

What is a provisional patent?

A provisional patent application is essentially a placeholder patent application filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office. Once filed, you have up to 1 year to convert the provisional patent application into a full utility patent application and, if not converted, the provisional automatically expires. Once the utility patent application is filed, the subject matter of the utility patent application (ie. invention) will be granted a claim date effective as of the date the provisional patent application was filed.

There are a few formal provisional drafting requirements, including a title, the name(s) of the inventor(s), address of the inventor(s), correspondence address, and a written description. At times, a drawing on the back of a napkin can be sufficient. The provisional application is not publicly available, and the USPTO does not conduct any review of it.

It is critical to understand that no patent rights are granted by the provisional patent application, except for the ability to file for a full utility patent application within the 1-year time frame for the invention described in the provisional patent application.

Positives

There are a number of benefits to a provisional patent application, namely:

1. Preserves your intellectual property rights as of the provisional’s filing date, which is critical in advance of any public disclosures you are contemplating;
2. Relatively inexpensive, with the cost of a provisional application being substantially less than a full utility patent application;
3. Is not made publicly available;
4. You are “Patent Pending”; and
5. May appeal to investors by beginning an intellectual property portfolio.

Negatives

The downsides to a provisional patent application are:

1. Does not issue as a patent;
2. Is not a utility patent and, unless converted into one, lapses after one year;
3. Since it is not reviewed by the USPTO, no stance is taken on whether the invention is patentable; and
4. Only exists under US law with no similar structure existing in Canada or Europe.

We believe that provisional patent applications are an immensely valuable resource for our clients, especially where deployed as a cost-effective means to secure a filing date for a subsequent utility patent in advance of contemplated public disclosures of the invention. However, when considering a provisional patent application, it’s critical to keep in mind that it’s a stepping stone to a full utility patent, and not a stand-alone patent application itself.

Feel free to reach out to the Voyer Law team to discuss provisional patent applications and a filing strategy for your invention.

We frequently work with Canadian startups operating a U.S. (usually Delaware) company incorporated on their behalf by Stripe Atlas.  On the surface, Stripe’s assistance with incorporating this U.S. company seems convenient and an easy way to meet the U.S. entity requirements to use the Stripe payment processing platform.  However, a number of material issues are generated by Stripe when it incorporates a U.S. company on behalf of a Canadian startup.

Problem #1

It’s critical to understand that a U.S. company cannot operate out of Canada without registering as doing business in Canada (thus exposing the company to unnecessarily complicated Canadian/US dual taxation), which Stripe does not address in its standard documentation.

The common solution to this is to treat the U.S. company as a parent to (or as a subsidiary of) a new Canadian company and isolate each company’s tax obligations in their respective countries.

Problem #2

Your U.S. company formed by Stripe needs to transact with your Canadian company on an arm’s length basis, taking into account tax transfer pricing rules.  If you don’t engage in tax planning around the flow of cash and assets between the two companies, expect expensive tax problems in the future

These tax issues can typically be addressed through cross-border tax planning as documented in an Intercompany Agreement in which we address the flow of cash and assets between the two companies.  For example, in the agreement we can address which company books sales in which countries and how the cash from these sales moves between the companies.

While Stripe Atlas touts the ease and speed with which a U.S. company can be incorporated, it neglects the massive cross-border legal and accounting issues that forming a U.S. company abroad generates.  If these issues are understood before incorporating, Stripe Atlas can be a valuable tool but, if not understood and planned for, expect it to generate more problems than it solves for.