Things Every Startup Should Know Before its First Financing
Startups often email me to assist with a financing expected to close a few days later. Eager to get the deal going, I ask about deal structure, such as type of investment, investor rights and size of round, only to learn that structure has yet to be determined and no firm commitments have been made by investors. While there is nothing wrong with these details being TBD, it benefits startups, their investors and legal counsel to fix as many deal terms before expectations of closing take root as until the above is set in stone, there is not deal.
Before beginning your first fundraising round, consider the following:
- Know your structure. Fixing the structure for your investment round is critical and shows investors that the company is sophisticated. Options include a priced round, convertible notes and SAFEs. There’s nothing worse than pitching to an interested investor and being unable to answer questions about the round’s structure.
- Have your Documents Ready. Be ready to close your lead investor quickly if they are ready to move forward with the investment. While investment documents may be negotiated further, having the documents ready shows professionalism and speeds the transaction toward close.
- Don’t treat Interest as Commitment. Until investors move beyond expressing interest and into reviewing and negotiating deal documents there is little merit to their interest. In my experience, converting investor interest into investor commitment is much more challenging than expected and you don’t want to plan the company’s direction over the next year based off expressed interest only to find out that you can close 1/2 the amount expected.
- Be Realistic in Closing Timeline. Attempting to close a round in a few days only happens if the above points have been addressed by the company. Legal counsel can prepare documents as quickly as the client requires but investors won’t move quickly until they know the investment structure and previously received draft documentation. With this in mind, set a realistic closing timeline.
Closing your first financing is daunting. By keeping in mind structure, documentation, investor commitments and setting realistic closing time-frames you will put your startup in a better position to successfully close the round.
Priced Rounds
As part of our day-to-day practice, we advise clients on different structures available for early-stage financing rounds. As part of these discussions, convertible notes and SAFEs are inevitably raised by the founder yet the concept of a priced round is rarely raised and sometimes not even understood by the founder. Priced rounds were the common approach to financing startups at all stages for over 25 years and are slowly making a comeback, which should be to the benefit of founders.
Understanding the Priced Round. Priced rounds are simple: the company and investors agree to a company valuation and the investors purchase shares in the company at this valuation. Conversely, convertible notes and SAFEs are premised on the parties NOT agreeing to a company valuation, which is answered at a later date when a priced round occurs (typically the series A round) and the convertible notes or SAFEs convert.
When are Rounds Priced? These days, priced rounds first arise during the Series A financing, where preferred shares are sold to investors. At this stage convertible notes and SAFEs usually convert. However, as advocated for in this post, any round can be priced including angel and seed rounds.
What are the Benefits to a Priced Round? The company knows exactly what % of the company is being sold in the round and the founders know exactly how much they are diluted. In a convertible note or SAFE financing there is some uncertainty as to how much of the company is actually being sold as these instruments typically convert on a fully diluted basis including the increase in option pool size required by the Series A investors yet the increase in the option pool is unknown until the Series A round. Additionally, priced rounds eliminate the confusion surrounding how numerous convertible notes and SAFEs, with different caps and conversion terms, convert (these calculations are difficult to understand, even for sophisticated parties).
We encourage our clients to explore priced common share rounds when considering the structure for their next early-stage investment round. Admittedly, some investors prefer convertible notes and SAFEs and others will reject a priced round valuation but accept the same valuation (or higher) as the cap on a convertible note or SAFE. While priced rounds may not work in all situations there is no harm in floating this as a possible investment structure. Indeed, sophisticated VCs, such as Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures, agree that pricing rounds may be in the best interest of startups and their founders and should be explored rather than avoided.
Avoid Absolute Anti-Dilution Protection
Anti-dilution protections are frequently granted to investors and forgotten by founders until their friendly lawyer brings it up. In many cases, anti-dilution protections are reasonable but in other cases can impose a substantial burden on the company, even impacting the appeal of the company to future investors.
Generally, anti-dilution protections protect an investor from the dilution of the investor’s interest. When VC’s speak about anti-dilution they are usually referring to price-based anti-dilution protections, which protect from a decrease in share price in a future financing (known as a “down-round”) by, ultimately, increasing the number of shares issued to previous round investors. This down-round protection is seen in Series A financings and Brad Feld has a great post covering the details.
What is FAR less common, and almost universally viewed as inappropriate, is an absolute anti-dilution clause. This type of dilution protection guarantees the investor a certain percentage of the company, usually for a fixed time. For example:
Startup hereby agrees to issue additional shares of Common Stock (for no additional consideration) to maintain Investor’s ownership interest at 10% of the total capital stock (calculated on a fully-diluted basis, including all options, warrants, convertible securities and other rights to acquire capital stock).
In the above case, the investor maintains a 10% interest in the company without a need to make additional payments. What if the company sells shares to a new investor? New shares are issued to the previous investor. What if the company issues options to employees? New shares are issued to the previous investor. The absolute anti-dilution clause is viewed as inappropriate as it protects the investor against ALL dilutive events, including those every investor expects to occur, rather than a limited set of dilutive events, such as a down-round.
The absolute anti-dilution clause also runs the risk of rendering your company less appealing to investors. An investor may reconsider an investment knowing that they will be immediately diluted by the previous investor’s absolute anti-dilution clause. This is especially the case if the new investor is increasing the company share price and, in turn, the value of the previous investor’s shares.
I usually encounter these absolute anti-dilution clauses in connection with an accelerator program investment. In this scenario, clients tend to accept the terms as acceptance to the program is viewed as worth the cost (which is a reasonable position to take). Nonetheless, it’s important for companies to understand the impact of absolute anti-dilution clauses and to weigh the pros and cons of any investment in light of an absolute anti-dilution clause before proceeding further.
Convertible Note and SAFE Overview
Startups commonly raise money through one of two instruments: (1) Convertible Note; or (2) SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity). While these instruments are common, founders need to understand the basics of each instrument and the points of negotiation available. This overview is part 1 of a 4 part series that, in future instalments, will cover negotiating each type of instrument and consider an alternative to these instruments.
Why use a Convertible Note or SAFE?
The Convertible Note and SAFE allow a startup to raise money without determining a value for the company. Many early-stage companies do not or cannot determine a company valuation, especially those companies that are pre-launch, yet need to raise money. These instruments are used to raise money but kick the question of valuation down the road until a future round values the company, otherwise known as a “priced round”. Among startups, a priced round typically occurs with a Series-A financing, which involves issuing preferred shares to investors.
It’s important to understand that, under either instrument, equity is not initially issued to investors. Instead, the instrument converts in the future into equity once the company raises a priced round, thereby establishing a company valuation at which the instrument can be converted.
NOTE – It is possible for startups to raise in priced rounds from day 1, a topic I will discuss in the final part of this series.
What is the difference between a Convertible Note and a SAFE?
A Convertible Note is a debt-equity instrument and, accordingly, charges interest while a SAFE is an equity instrument. The interest element to the Convertible Note was part of the reason for the shift to SAFEs as this element created, in some situations, unnecessary legal issues.
From a negotiation standpoint, the instruments vary in the different elements commonly subject to negotiation. A Convertible Note involves, at a minimum, discussions around: cap, discount, interest and maturity date . Conversely, a SAFE usually involves one point of negotiation: cap. This single point of negotiation has led to increased use of the SAFE over the Convertible Note.
These instruments also differ in how they convert. A SAFE only converts upon a preferred share financing round (a priced round), which usually is a Series-A financing. If a preferred share round does not occur then the SAFE remains unconverted and no shares are issued to the SAFE holder. Conversely, a Convertible Note converts upon either a priced round (may not be preferred, depends on the note) OR at its maturity date. As a result, a Convertible Note will always convert while a SAFE may not.
NOTE – there are additional points that can be negotiated on both Convertible Notes and SAFEs, for example, a discount or preemptive rights.
What is a Cap, Discount, Interest and Maturity Date?
Cap: the maximum value at which the instrument converts into equity. If the priced round values the company below the cap, the instrument converts at the priced round value (perhaps with a discount) and if the priced round values the company greater than the cap, the instrument converts at the cap value. For example, if a company raises a priced round valuing the company at $12 million and a SAFE has a $10 million cap, the SAFE converts at a $10 million valuation. It is possible for Convertible Notes and SAFEs to be issued without a cap, meaning that they convert at the priced round valuation, perhaps with a discount.
Discount: discount an investor receives on conversion of the instrument, which may only occur upon particular conversion scenarios.
Interest: Convertible Notes have a debt element and, accordingly, charge interest to the company issuing the note. Interest is calculated into the total value of the Convertible Note upon conversion.
Maturity Date: the date on which a Convertible Note must have converted by and, if no conversion has occurred, the note automatically converts on the maturity date.
Overall, Convertible Notes and SAFES are similar in the goal each instrument tries to achieve: raising money without determining a company valuation. While similar in goal, each document has its own negotiation points, which will be covered in our next blog posts. Stay tuned!