On January 1, 2024, the US Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) launched the online BOI E-Filing System and began accepting Beneficial Owner Information Reports pursuant to a new compliance regime under the Corporate Transparency Act.

1. Who needs to file?

Starting January 1, 2024, all non-exempt entities formed or registered to do business in the United States are required report Beneficial Owner Information (“BOI”) to FinCEN by January 1, 2025. This includes all corporations, LLCs, limited partnerships or similar entities created by filing a document with any US state, territory or Indian tribe as well as foreign non-US entities that are registered to do business with any US state, territory or Indian tribe.

2.  Who is a beneficial owner?

A beneficial owner is any individual who, directly or indirectly:

An individual exercises “substantial control” of a reporting entity if such individual:

3.  What information needs to be provided?

A reporting entity is required to provide the following information about Beneficial Owners:

4.  Who is exempt from the Beneficial Ownership Information filings?

There are 23 exemptions, which are listed in greater detail in the Small Entity Compliance Guide by FinCen.

One of the key exemptions is for “large operating companies” that: (1) employ 20 full time employees in the US; (2) has a physical presence in the US; and (3) filed federal income tax for the previous year demonstrating more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales.

Other key exemptions are for inactive entities that are not engaged in active business and for subsidiaries of any other exempt entities.

5.  What does this mean for you?

If you are a beneficial owner of a US entity and not exempt from the filing requirements, failure to maintain and file a BOI Report by January 1, 2025 may result in fines up to $500 per day per violation and potential imprisonment.

Please reach out to the Voyer Law team to discuss your Beneficial Ownership Information filing requirements and whether your entity qualifies as an exempt entity.

Canadians often ask us to incorporate LLCs.  In response, our answer is always (1) LLCs do not exist in Canada and are only available in the US; and (2) incorporating a LLC for a Canadian tax resident is usually a bad idea. In this blog post we’ll explain what a LLC is, why it’s a less than ideal structure for Canadians (mostly) and a few situations where a LLC may be beneficial for Canadians.

1.  What is a LLC?  A LLC, or Limited Liability Company, is a type of corporate structure available ONLY in the US. LLCs don’t have shareholders (instead they have members) or shares (instead they have membership interests, represented by either a percentage or units (or both)).

2.  How are LLCs taxed?  LLCs are, by default, treated as a partnership for US tax purposes, meaning that profits and losses flow through to the individual members.  Conversely, LLCs are treated as corporations for Canadian tax purposes.

3.  Why LLCs are bad for Canadians.  The ownership of a LLC membership interest by a Canadian is “bad” as LLC income is double taxed, without an available Canadian tax credit. First, LLC income is treated as partnership income for US tax purposes and taxed as such.  Second, LLC income is treated by CRA as dividend income and taxed again.  Problematically, no tax credit is available in Canada to negate such double taxation as the income types are not taxed the same, partnership distribution vs dividend, in addition to a timing issue.

4.  Is there any case for a LLC?  There are a few situations where LLCs may not result in double taxation, for example if a LLC is incorporated into a tax-oriented structure involving additional US entities to avoid direct Canadian ownership of the LLC.

As a general rule, direct ownership of a LLC by a Canadian tax resident is not recommended due to the double taxation that results. While there are options for a Canadian to take advantage of a LLC, such options involve complicated cross-border tax planning and require the assistance of experienced legal and tax professionals.

Weekly, we receive phone calls from prospective clients inquiring about provisional patent applications. While provisional patent applications have a number of benefits, especially for cost-conscious startups and entrepreneurs, we too often encounter misconceptions concerning the protections that a provisional patent application provides. In this blog post we will cover what a provision patent application is, its positives and negatives.

What is a provisional patent?

A provisional patent application is essentially a placeholder patent application filed with the US Patent and Trademark Office. Once filed, you have up to 1 year to convert the provisional patent application into a full utility patent application and, if not converted, the provisional automatically expires. Once the utility patent application is filed, the subject matter of the utility patent application (ie. invention) will be granted a claim date effective as of the date the provisional patent application was filed.

There are a few formal provisional drafting requirements, including a title, the name(s) of the inventor(s), address of the inventor(s), correspondence address, and a written description. At times, a drawing on the back of a napkin can be sufficient. The provisional application is not publicly available, and the USPTO does not conduct any review of it.

It is critical to understand that no patent rights are granted by the provisional patent application, except for the ability to file for a full utility patent application within the 1-year time frame for the invention described in the provisional patent application.

Positives

There are a number of benefits to a provisional patent application, namely:

1. Preserves your intellectual property rights as of the provisional’s filing date, which is critical in advance of any public disclosures you are contemplating;
2. Relatively inexpensive, with the cost of a provisional application being substantially less than a full utility patent application;
3. Is not made publicly available;
4. You are “Patent Pending”; and
5. May appeal to investors by beginning an intellectual property portfolio.

Negatives

The downsides to a provisional patent application are:

1. Does not issue as a patent;
2. Is not a utility patent and, unless converted into one, lapses after one year;
3. Since it is not reviewed by the USPTO, no stance is taken on whether the invention is patentable; and
4. Only exists under US law with no similar structure existing in Canada or Europe.

We believe that provisional patent applications are an immensely valuable resource for our clients, especially where deployed as a cost-effective means to secure a filing date for a subsequent utility patent in advance of contemplated public disclosures of the invention. However, when considering a provisional patent application, it’s critical to keep in mind that it’s a stepping stone to a full utility patent, and not a stand-alone patent application itself.

Feel free to reach out to the Voyer Law team to discuss provisional patent applications and a filing strategy for your invention.

We frequently work with Canadian startups operating a U.S. (usually Delaware) company incorporated on their behalf by Stripe Atlas.  On the surface, Stripe’s assistance with incorporating this U.S. company seems convenient and an easy way to meet the U.S. entity requirements to use the Stripe payment processing platform.  However, a number of material issues are generated by Stripe when it incorporates a U.S. company on behalf of a Canadian startup.

Problem #1

It’s critical to understand that a U.S. company cannot operate out of Canada without registering as doing business in Canada (thus exposing the company to unnecessarily complicated Canadian/US dual taxation), which Stripe does not address in its standard documentation.

The common solution to this is to treat the U.S. company as a parent to (or as a subsidiary of) a new Canadian company and isolate each company’s tax obligations in their respective countries.

Problem #2

Your U.S. company formed by Stripe needs to transact with your Canadian company on an arm’s length basis, taking into account tax transfer pricing rules.  If you don’t engage in tax planning around the flow of cash and assets between the two companies, expect expensive tax problems in the future

These tax issues can typically be addressed through cross-border tax planning as documented in an Intercompany Agreement in which we address the flow of cash and assets between the two companies.  For example, in the agreement we can address which company books sales in which countries and how the cash from these sales moves between the companies.

While Stripe Atlas touts the ease and speed with which a U.S. company can be incorporated, it neglects the massive cross-border legal and accounting issues that forming a U.S. company abroad generates.  If these issues are understood before incorporating, Stripe Atlas can be a valuable tool but, if not understood and planned for, expect it to generate more problems than it solves for.